H ospital revenue cycle teams are under increasing pressure to do more than submit clean claims and manage denials. In today’s reimbursement environment, they also need to know whether claims that were paid were paid correctly.
That sounds simple. In practice, it is one of the hardest parts of revenue cycle management.
Many hospitals manage thousands of payer plans, each with its own reimbursement rules, payment methodologies, contract terms, authorization requirements, carve-outs, and escalation pathways. Even when claims are accepted and payments are posted, small variances between expected and actual reimbursement can go unnoticed. Over time, those small variances can create significant revenue leakage.
For hospitals operating with complex payer mixes, contract management is no longer just a back-office function. It is becoming a strategic financial priority.
Medicare Advantage is one of the clearest examples of this shift. More than half of eligible Medicare beneficiaries are now enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, and these plans account for a growing share of hospital inpatient days. KFF reported that Medicare Advantage grew from 13% of total inpatient hospital days in 2015 to 25% in 2023. By that same year, half of all Medicare inpatient hospital days were attributed to Medicare Advantage enrollees. [1]
That growth matters for hospitals because Medicare Advantage plans often bring more administrative complexity than traditional Medicare. Prior authorization requirements, payer-specific rules, medical necessity reviews, observation status issues, delayed payments, and payment disputes can all increase the burden on revenue cycle teams.
The American Hospital Association has also pointed to certain Medicare Advantage practices, including delays, denials, and underpayments, as contributors to hospital financial pressure. According to AHA, hospital reimbursement from Medicare Advantage plans fell on a cost basis between 2019 and 2024, further increasing the need for hospitals to understand payer performance with greater precision. [2]
For organizations with a high concentration of Medicare Advantage, commercial, Medicaid, self-pay, and specialized reimbursement arrangements, the challenge is not simply getting claims out the door. The challenge is knowing whether each payer is performing according to contract expectations.
Denied claims are visible. They create work queues, trigger follow-up activity, and often receive immediate attention.
Underpaid claims are different.
A claim may be processed, paid, posted, and closed while still falling short of the amount the hospital expected to receive. Without a structured process for comparing expected reimbursement against actual reimbursement, those underpayments can be difficult to identify.
This is where contract visibility becomes essential. Hospitals need a way to connect contract terms, payer plan structures, payment data, and variance reporting into a process that can be monitored over time.
MGMA has noted that payer underpayments are often driven by contract complexity, limited visibility into expected reimbursement, and manual processes that cannot scale across high claim volumes. [3] In other words, the issue is not always that hospitals do not know underpayments exist. It is that finding them consistently requires more structure than manual review can provide.
Many hospitals struggle with payer plan structures that have grown over time. New plans are added. Old plans remain active. Naming conventions vary. Similar plans may be duplicated. Reporting becomes harder to trust.
When payer structures are fragmented, revenue cycle teams may struggle to answer basic but critical questions:
Without clean payer plan structures and consistent reporting, leaders may have limited visibility into where revenue is being lost.
That matters because revenue cycle performance is central to hospital stability. A Guidehouse/HFMA revenue cycle report described RCM as critical to the success, stability, resilience, and growth of hospitals, health systems, physician groups, and other providers. [4] Strong contract management supports that stability by helping organizations identify problems earlier and respond with better data.
Contract management is not only about recovering underpaid claims. It also gives hospitals better insight into payer behavior.
With the right structure in place, revenue cycle and finance teams can move beyond anecdotal payer concerns and begin looking at measurable trends. That can support stronger internal decision-making and better external conversations with payers.
For example, variance reporting can help hospitals identify whether a payer is repeatedly processing claims below expected reimbursement. It can also help isolate recurring denial patterns, coding-related discrepancies, or contract interpretation issues.
Over time, this information can support:
For hospitals with complex payer environments, this kind of visibility is especially important. Without it, underpayments may remain hidden inside closed accounts, and payer issues may only surface after months of lost revenue opportunity.
A reactive revenue cycle process waits for problems to become visible.
A proactive contract management process looks for problems before they become larger financial issues.
That shift requires more than technology. It also requires clean payer structures, consistent reporting, regular review, and collaboration between the people responsible for billing, follow-up, managed care, finance, and leadership.
When teams meet regularly to review payer performance and reimbursement variances, contract management becomes an ongoing discipline rather than a one-time project. Issues can be tracked, escalated, and resolved with greater consistency.
For many hospitals, that is the difference between occasional recovery and sustainable revenue protection.
Larkin Health System serves one of South Florida’s most diverse patient populations. Their payer mix includes significant Medicare Advantage volume, traditional Medicare, commercial insurance, managed Medicaid, self-pay, detention populations, and global bundle reimbursement arrangements.
That diversity created a complex reimbursement environment requiring stronger contract oversight, clearer reporting, and more consistent variance identification.
By partnering with MEDTEAM, Larkin streamlined its payer plan structure from approximately 6,000 plans to roughly 2,500 standardized plans. This helped improve reporting clarity and made reimbursement trends easier to analyze.
With a structured contract management process in place, MEDTEAM helped Larkin systematically review payments across high-volume payer categories, including Medicare Advantage and contracted commercial plans. The enhanced visibility supported identification of payment variances related to denials, coding discrepancies, and payer processing inconsistencies.
The result: Over $2.7 million in revenue recovered, nearly $5 million in revenue opportunities identified, improved visibility into payer performance, and an ongoing process for monitoring reimbursement accuracy.
For hospitals facing similar payer complexity, Larkin’s experience shows what can happen when contract management becomes more than a reporting function. It becomes a strategy for protecting entitled revenue.
Read the full case study to see how MEDTEAM helped the organization gain visibility, simplify payer reporting, and identify revenue opportunities across a complex reimbursement landscape.
“When we call MEDTEAM, it is great that they are always on board working to help us, whatever the need is.” - Chief Nursing Officer
Stay in the loop
Connect with us on social media or give us a call at 1.844.615.1803
